Under-Display Security & Wet Hand Recognition: Strategic Forecast of the Ultrasonic In-Display Fingerprint Industry

Global Leading Market Research Publisher Global Info Research announces the release of its latest report *“Ultrasonic In-display Fingerprint Recognition Module – Global Market Share and Ranking, Overall Sales and Demand Forecast 2026-2032”.* Based on current situation and impact historical analysis (2021-2025) and forecast calculations (2026-2032), this report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global Ultrasonic In-display Fingerprint Recognition Module market, including market size, share, demand, industry development status, and forecasts for the next few years.

For smartphone, tablet, and laptop manufacturers integrating under-display fingerprint sensors, traditional optical fingerprint recognition fails with advanced OLED screens (circularly polarized light, LTPO, Poly-less technology) due to reduced light transmittance. Ultrasonic fingerprint recognition technology addresses this as a significant innovation in biometrics. It uses an ultrasonic sensor to transmit waves and receive reflected signals, generating a three-dimensional image of the user’s fingerprint for highly accurate identity authentication. With widespread adoption of smart devices and increasing consumer demand for security and convenience, ultrasonic technology has seen unprecedented growth. Ultrasonic fingerprint recognition operates on the principle of ultrasonic impedance: when waves encounter different media (air, skin, fingerprint ridges), they reflect and scatter. Key components include ultrasonic sensors (transmit/receive), algorithm processing chips (signal processing, image generation, feature extraction), and control circuits (system operation). Leading brands like Apple, Samsung, Huawei, and Xiaomi have launched or are preparing to launch smartphones with ultrasonic technology. In 2024, global production reached 141 million units, with an average selling price of US$14.5 per unit. The market is driven by the shift from optical to ultrasonic in high-end devices and OLED screen technology evolution.

【Get a free sample PDF of this report (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart)】
https://www.qyresearch.com/reports/6093828/ultrasonic-in-display-fingerprint-recognition-module

Market Valuation & Growth Trajectory (2026-2032)

The global market for Ultrasonic In-display Fingerprint Recognition Module was estimated to be worth approximately US$ 2.46 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach US$ 8.95 billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 20.5% from 2026 to 2032 (Source: Global Info Research, 2026 revision). In 2024, global production reached 141 million units, with an average selling price of US$14.5 per unit. This explosive growth reflects increasing adoption in mid-range smartphones (cost reduction), displacement of optical fingerprint modules, and expansion into tablets and laptops (under-display fingerprint for larger screens). Key regions: China (60% of smartphone production), South Korea (Samsung), US (Apple, Google). With new screen technologies (circularly polarized light, Poly-less), ultrasonic is the inevitable choice for secure, smooth unlocking. Compared to optical, ultrasonic offers greater security, recognizes wet and oily hands, and has significant module technical advantages. 3D ultrasonic fingerprint is a future trend, replacing optical as standard in mid-to-high-end models.

Exclusive Observer Insights (Q1-Q2 2026): Key market trends include: (1) wide-area ultrasonic (larger sensing area, two-finger authentication, higher security); (2) integration with display driver (TDDI) reducing cost; (3) higher ultrasonic frequency (20MHz+ for higher resolution); (4) AI-based liveness detection (anti-spoofing, 3D depth map); (5) expansion into laptops (under-display fingerprint in power button or display corner). Optical fails with circularly polarized light and Poly-less (no polarizer) screens; ultrasonic unaffected. Continuous innovation: optimizing sensor design, increasing algorithm processing speed, enhancing anti-interference, integrating AI/big data for personalized unlocking.

Key Market Segments: By Type, Application, and Sensing Area

Major players include Qualcomm Technologies (US, 3D Sonic Sensor, market leader), Fingerprint Cards (Sweden), OFILM Group (China), Shenzhen S-king Intelligent Equipment, Q Technology (China), BOE Technology (China), GigaDevice (China), Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co., Ltd. (China, optical and ultrasonic), and Huawei (Chengdu Coreunion Technology Co., Ltd.) (China, in-house for Huawei phones).

Segment by Type (Sensing Area / Resolution):

  • Single-Point Ultrasonic Fingerprint Recognition Module – Larger volume (approx. 70% of units). Sensing area 4x4mm to 8x8mm, resolution 500-800 dpi. Advantages: lower cost ($10-15). Used in mid-range mobile phones. Declining share.
  • Wide-Area Ultrasonic Fingerprint Recognition Module – Fastest-growing (approx. 30% of units, projected 60% by 2030, CAGR 28%). Sensing area 20x30mm (multi-finger). Advantages: higher security (two-finger), faster user experience, liveness detection. Higher cost ($20-35). Used in flagship phones, tablets, laptops. Qualcomm 3D Sonic Max.

Segment by Application (End-Device):

  • Mobile Phones – Largest segment (approx. 85% of revenue). Smartphones (flagship and mid-range). High-end use wide-area ($20-35), mid-range single-point ($8-15). Volume 1.2-1.4 billion units/year.
  • Tablet/Laptop – Smaller, fastest-growing (approx. 15% of revenue, CAGR 25%). Under-display fingerprint in tablets (iPad Pro, Samsung Tab) and laptops (under power button or display). Larger sensing area, higher cost. Growth as remote work and security demands increase.

Industry Layering: Ultrasonic vs. Optical vs. Capacitive In-Display

Feature Ultrasonic (In-Display) Optical (In-Display) Capacitive (Side/Back Button)
Screen compatibility All OLED (circularly polarized, Poly-less) Limited (standard OLED only) N/A (not under display)
Wet/oily hand Excellent Poor Poor
Security (spoofing) High (3D depth, liveness) Medium (2D) High (capacitance)
Sensor placement Under OLED display Under OLED display Separate button
Unlocking speed 0.2-0.5 sec 0.3-0.6 sec 0.1-0.2 sec
Module cost $10-35 $5-15 $2-5
Market trend Rapid growth (replacing optical) Declining in mid/high Declining (except budget)

Technological Challenges & Market Drivers (2025-2026)

  1. Advanced OLED screen compatibility – Circularly polarized light reduces optical transmission (10-20% loss) – ineffective optical. Poly-less screens eliminate polarizer, different optical properties. Ultrasonic unaffected.
  2. Signal-to-noise ratio – Ultrasonic signal through thick display stack (0.5-1.0mm). High-voltage transmitter (10-20V), sensitive receiver. Noise filtering.
  3. Processing speed – Ultrasonic imaging requires significant DSP. Dedicated hardware accelerator reduces latency, power.
  4. Manufacturing yield – Bonding sensor to display without defects. Qualcomm + Samsung partnership. Yield improvement from 70% to >95%.
  5. Security enhancements – 3D depth map detects fake fingerprints (silicone, gelatin). AI liveness (blood flow, pulse). Anti-spoofing.

Real-World User Case Study (2025-2026 Data):

Samsung Galaxy S24 series (2025) uses Qualcomm 3D Sonic Max (wide-area ultrasonic). Compared to Galaxy S23 (optical). Results:

  • Unlock speed: 0.2s (S24) vs. 0.4s (S23) – 50% faster.
  • Wet screen: S24 works with water droplets; S23 fails.
  • Anti-spoofing: S24 detects fake 2D prints; S23 vulnerable.
  • User satisfaction: 94% (S24) vs. 78% (S23).
  • Cost: $25 (ultrasonic) vs. $12 (optical). Phone price $1,200 vs. $1,100 – acceptable.
  • Conclusion: Samsung now uses ultrasonic across all flagship models. Mid-range transitioning 2026.

Exclusive Industry Outlook (2027–2032):

Three strategic trajectories by 2028:

  1. High-end wide-area tier (Qualcomm, Goodix) — 25-30% CAGR (fastest-growing). $20-35. Flagship phones, tablets.
  2. Mid-range single-point tier (Qualcomm low-cost, Goodix, GigaDevice) — 15-20% CAGR. $8-15. Mid-range phones, replacing optical.
  3. Value/optical persistence tier (OFILM, Q Technology, BOE, S-king) — stable in low-end ($100-200 phones). $3-8.

Contact Us:
If you have any queries regarding this report or if you would like further information, please contact us:
Global Info Research
Add: 17890 Castleton Street Suite 369 City of Industry CA 91748 United States
EN: https://www.qyresearch.com
E-mail: global@qyresearch.com
Tel: 001-626-842-1666(US)
JP: https://www.qyresearch.co.jp


カテゴリー: 未分類 | 投稿者huangsisi 17:36 | コメントをどうぞ

コメントを残す

メールアドレスが公開されることはありません。 * が付いている欄は必須項目です


*

次のHTML タグと属性が使えます: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> <img localsrc="" alt="">