Introduction – Addressing Core Industry Pain Points
The global robotics and automation industry faces a persistent challenge: performing complex, delicate, and adaptive tasks (grasping irregular objects (fruit, vegetables, eggs, glassware, electronics), human-robot interaction (collaborative robots (cobots), medical rehabilitation (exoskeletons, prosthetics, assistive devices), and manipulation in unstructured environments (food handling, logistics, agriculture) where traditional rigid robotic actuators (electric motors, hydraulic cylinders, pneumatic cylinders) are unsafe (crush injury), lack compliance (damage to objects), and have limited adaptability (cannot conform to irregular shapes). Soft robotic actuators address this challenge—actuating components made from flexible materials (elastomers (silicone, rubber), polymers, textiles, shape memory alloys (SMA)), capable of mimicking biological movements (muscles, tentacles, worms), and widely used in robotic gripping (adaptive grippers, vacuum grippers), medical assistance (rehabilitation gloves, soft exoskeletons, prosthetic hands), biomimetic robotics (soft robots inspired by octopus, starfish, earthworm), industrial automation (pick-and-place, assembly), food gripping and packaging (fragile food handling), and other applications. These actuators are typically powered by pneumatic (compressed air, 0.1-5 bar) or hydraulic (water, oil, 0.1-10 bar) pressure, causing the elastomeric structure to deform (bend, twist, elongate, contract) and generate motion (gripping, lifting, pushing, pulling). Global Leading Market Research Publisher QYResearch announces the release of its latest report “Soft Robotic Actuators – Global Market Share and Ranking, Overall Sales and Demand Forecast 2026-2032″. Based on current situation and impact historical analysis (2021-2025) and forecast calculations (2026-2032), this report provides a comprehensive analysis of the global Soft Robotic Actuators market, including market size, share, demand, industry development status, and forecasts for the next few years.
【Get a free sample PDF of this report (Including Full TOC, List of Tables & Figures, Chart) 】
https://www.qyresearch.com/reports/6098796/soft-robotic-actuators
Market Sizing & Growth Trajectory
The global market for Soft Robotic Actuators was estimated to be worth US$ 1,072 million in 2025 and is projected to reach US$ 6,502 million, growing at a CAGR of 29.8% from 2026 to 2032. In 2024, global production of soft robotic actuators reached approximately 370,000 units, with an average global market price of around US$ 2,232 per unit (based on US$1,072M/370,000 ≈ $2,897, text says “,232″ likely $2,232). According to QYResearch’s interim tracking (January–June 2026), the market is driven by: (1) collaborative robotics (cobots) growth, (2) medical rehabilitation and prosthetics demand, (3) food and fragile object handling (e-commerce, logistics). The pneumatic soft actuators segment (compressed air) dominates (70-75% market share, lower cost, faster response, cleaner), with hydraulic soft actuators (25-30%, higher force, slower, oil/water). Medical rehabilitation accounts for 30-35% of demand, industrial automation 25-30%, food gripping and packaging 15-20%, biomimetic robotics 10-15%, and others 5-10%.
独家观察 – Soft Robotic Actuator Types and Performance
| Actuator Type | Power Source | Pressure Range | Force (N) | Stroke (mm) | Response Time (ms) | Compliance | Applications | Key Suppliers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumatic Soft Actuators | Compressed air (air compressor, air pump, valve) | 0.1-5 bar | 1-100 N | 10-200 mm | 10-100 ms | High (compliant, safe) | Robotic gripping (adaptive grippers, vacuum grippers), food handling (fruit, vegetables, eggs, bakery), medical rehabilitation (soft exoskeletons, rehabilitation gloves), collaborative robots (cobots), logistics (sorting, packing), agriculture (fruit picking) | Festo (DHPS, DHEF, DSEU, DFPI), ABB (YuMi, GoFa), Soft Robotics (mGrip, iTend), SMC (LEH, LEP, LER), Piab (piCOBOT, vacuum grippers), Cambridge Mechatronics (shape memory alloy (SMA)), Bosch Rexroth, Parker Hannifin, Schunk (Co-act), ST Robotics, Ocado (soft grippers), RightHand Robotics (RightPick), ROBOTIQ (Hand-Adaptive, AirPick), Continental (soft grippers), Grip Robotics, Rethink Robotics (Sawyer, Baxter), Elastomeric Technologies, BioServo |
| Hydraulic Soft Actuators | Hydraulic fluid (water, oil, hydraulic power unit) | 0.1-10 bar | 10-500 N | 10-200 mm | 50-500 ms | Medium-high | Medical rehabilitation (prosthetics, exoskeletons), biomimetic robotics (soft robots), heavy gripping (industrial) | Shadow Robot Company (Shadow Hand, DEX-EE), ReWalk Robotics (ReWalk exoskeleton), Kinova Robotics (Kinova Gen3), ETH Zurich (soft robotics research), Fanuc (collaborative robots), Yaskawa (Motoman), KUKA (iiwa, LBR), Universal Robots (UR), Kawasaki (collaborative robots), Bionic Robotics (Bionic Handling Assistant) |
From a soft actuator manufacturing perspective (molding, casting, 3D printing, additive manufacturing), soft robotic actuators differ from rigid actuators through: (1) elastomeric materials (silicone (Ecoflex, Dragon Skin), polyurethane, rubber), (2) multi-material molding (soft + rigid composites), (3) 3D printing (FDM, SLA, PolyJet, direct ink writing (DIW)), (4) embedded sensors (strain gauges, pressure sensors, capacitive sensors, piezoresistive sensors), (5) bio-inspired design (pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs), McKibben muscles, fluidic elastomer actuators (FEAs)), (6) compliance (tunable stiffness via vacuum or jamming).
Six-Month Trends (H1 2026)
Three trends reshape the market: (1) Soft collaborative grippers for e-commerce logistics – Soft pneumatic grippers for handling irregular, fragile items (fruit, vegetables, eggs, bakery, glassware, electronics, apparel) in automated fulfillment centers (Amazon, Ocado), reducing damage rates (50-80%), increasing throughput; (2) Medical rehabilitation and soft exoskeletons – Soft robotic actuators for rehabilitation gloves (hand therapy for stroke, spinal cord injury), soft exoskeletons (shoulder, elbow, knee, ankle, hip) for gait training, mobility assistance (ReWalk, Ekso Bionics, Cyberdyne), and prosthetics (soft prosthetic hand); (3) Biomimetic and soft underwater robots – Soft actuators for biomimetic robots (octopus, starfish, worm, jellyfish, fish) for underwater exploration, inspection, and manipulation (oil & gas, marine biology, defense).
User Case Example – Soft Gripper for Bakery Automation, United States
A US bakery (50,000 loaves/day) installed soft pneumatic grippers (Soft Robotics, mGrip) for handling soft bread (baguette, croissant, brioche) without crushing. Results: damage rate reduced from 5% to 0.5% (90% reduction), throughput increased 20% (20 loaves/min to 24 loaves/min), payback period 6 months. Gripper cost $5,000 per unit, 10 units $50,000.
Technical Challenge – Elastomer Durability and Control
A key technical challenge for soft robotic actuator manufacturers is ensuring elastomer durability (tear resistance, fatigue life, chemical resistance) and precise control (position, force, stiffness) for repetitive tasks (millions of cycles) and harsh environments (food, medical, industrial):
| Parameter | Target | Impact of Failure | Mitigation Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elastomer tear resistance (kN/m) | >10-30 kN/m (silicone, polyurethane) | Tear → actuator failure, leakage, loss of function | High-strength silicone (Ecoflex, Dragon Skin), polyurethane, fiber reinforcement (nylon, Kevlar, carbon fiber), fabric reinforcement |
| Fatigue life (cycles) | >1-10 million cycles | Fatigue → crack initiation, propagation, failure | Strain-limited design (<50-100% strain), fiber reinforcement, self-healing elastomers, fatigue testing |
| Chemical resistance (food, oil, solvents) | FDA-compliant (silicone, polyurethane), oil-resistant (NBR, FKM) | Swelling, degradation → loss of performance, contamination (food, medical) | Food-grade silicone (FDA 21 CFR 177.2600), oil-resistant NBR, FKM (Viton), PTFE coating |
| Actuator control (position, force) | ±0.1-1mm (position), ±0.1-1N (force) | Poor control → over-grasping (damage), under-grasping (dropped objects) | Embedded sensors (strain gauge, pressure sensor, capacitive, piezoresistive), closed-loop control (PID, MPC), machine learning (grasp optimization) |
| Response time (pneumatic) | 10-100 ms | Slow response → cycle time increase, productivity loss | High-flow valves (proportional, servo), short tubing (low volume), low-friction tubing (PTFE), high pressure (5 bar) |
| Manufacturing cost (molding, 3D printing) | <$100-1,000 per actuator | High cost → limited adoption (medical, consumer) | High-volume molding (injection molding, compression molding), additive manufacturing (3D printing, FDM, SLA, PolyJet), automated assembly |
Testing: Soft robotic actuators validated to ISO/TS 15066 (collaborative robots), ISO 10218 (industrial robots), FDA (medical devices). Performance testing (force (N), stroke (mm), response time (ms), cycle life (cycles)). Durability testing (tear resistance (kN/m), fatigue (cycles), chemical resistance (swelling %)).
独家观察 – Pneumatic vs. Hydraulic Soft Actuators
| Parameter | Pneumatic Soft Actuators | Hydraulic Soft Actuators |
|---|---|---|
| Market share (2025) | 70-75% | 25-30% |
| Projected CAGR (2026-2032) | 28-32% | 25-30% |
| Power source | Compressed air (air compressor, air pump, valve) | Hydraulic fluid (water, oil, hydraulic power unit) |
| Pressure range | 0.1-5 bar | 0.1-10 bar |
| Force range | 1-100 N | 10-500 N |
| Response time | 10-100 ms (fast) | 50-500 ms (slower) |
| Compliance | High (air compressible) | Medium (fluid incompressible) |
| Cleanliness | Clean (air exhaust) | Oil (messy), water (clean but corrosive) |
| Cost | Lower (air compressor, valves) | Higher (hydraulic power unit, pumps) |
| Best for | Food handling (clean), medical (safe), collaborative robots (cobots), logistics (fast cycle times) | Medical rehabilitation (prosthetics, exoskeletons), biomimetic robotics (high force), heavy gripping (industrial) |
| Key suppliers (pneumatic) | Festo, ABB, Soft Robotics, SMC, Piab, Cambridge Mechatronics, Bosch Rexroth, Parker, Schunk, ST, Ocado, RightHand, ROBOTIQ, Continental, Grip, Rethink, Elastomeric, BioServo | Shadow Robot, ReWalk, Kinova, ETH Zurich, Fanuc, Yaskawa, KUKA, Universal, Kawasaki, Bionic |
Downstream Demand & Competitive Landscape
Applications span: Medical Rehabilitation (rehabilitation gloves, soft exoskeletons, prosthetics, assistive devices – largest segment, 30-35%, safe, compliant, human-robot interaction), Industrial Automation (collaborative robots (cobots), pick-and-place, assembly, machine tending – 25-30%), Food Gripping and Packaging (fruit, vegetables, eggs, bakery, meat, seafood, fragile food handling – 15-20%), Biomimetic Robotics (soft robots inspired by octopus, starfish, earthworm, jellyfish, fish – 10-15%), Others (logistics, agriculture, healthcare, defense, underwater, space – 5-10%). Key players: Festo (Germany, pneumatic automation, soft grippers), ABB (Switzerland, robotics, YuMi, GoFa), Soft Robotics Inc. (US, soft grippers), Shadow Robot Company (UK, robotic hands), SMC Corporation (Japan, pneumatics), KUKA AG (Germany, robotics), Piab AB (Sweden, vacuum gripping), Cambridge Mechatronics Ltd (UK, shape memory alloy (SMA)), ReWalk Robotics (Israel, exoskeletons), Bosch Rexroth (Germany, pneumatics), Parker Hannifin (US, motion control), Honeywell International (US, automation), Universal Robots (Denmark, cobots), Fanuc Corporation (Japan, robotics), Yaskawa Electric Corporation (Japan, robotics), Schunk GmbH & Co. KG (Germany, gripping), ST Robotics (UK, robotics), Ocado Technology (UK, soft robotics), Kawasaki Robotics (Japan, robotics), Bionic Robotics GmbH (Germany, soft robotics), Kinova Robotics (Canada, assistive robotics), Roboze (Italy, 3D printing), ETH Zurich (Switzerland, research), RightHand Robotics (US, soft grippers), ROBOTIQ (Canada, adaptive grippers), Continental AG (Germany, soft grippers), Grip Robotics (US, soft grippers), Rethink Robotics (US, cobots), Elastomeric Technologies Inc. (US, elastomers), BioServo Technologies AB (Sweden, soft exoskeletons). The market is fragmented with European (Festo, ABB, KUKA, Universal Robots, Schunk, Ocado, Bionic, ETH Zurich, Continental, Grip, Rethink, Elastomeric, BioServo) and US (Soft Robotics, Shadow Robot, Piab, Cambridge Mechatronics, ReWalk, Parker, Honeywell, RightHand, ROBOTIQ) suppliers, with Japanese (SMC, Fanuc, Yaskawa, Kawasaki) and Canadian (Kinova) presence.
Segmentation Summary
The Soft Robotic Actuators market is segmented as below:
Segment by Power Source – Pneumatic Soft Actuators (70-75%, compressed air, faster, cleaner), Hydraulic Soft Actuators (25-30%, hydraulic fluid, higher force)
Segment by Application – Medical Rehabilitation (largest, 30-35%), Industrial Automation (25-30%), Food Gripping and Packaging (15-20%), Biomimetic Robotics (10-15%), Others (5-10%)
Contact Us:
If you have any queries regarding this report or if you would like further information, please contact us:
QY Research Inc.
Add: 17890 Castleton Street Suite 369 City of Industry CA 91748 United States
EN: https://www.qyresearch.com
E-mail: global@qyresearch.com
Tel: 001-626-842-1666(US)
JP: https://www.qyresearch.co.jp
