カテゴリー別アーカイブ: jamming

What Is the Level of Ease for Someone to Observe Your Whereabouts?

Tracking someone’s whereabouts is not solely a theme found in traditional spy films; it is a genuine phenomenon in the modern world. With the assistance of cutting-edge technology, individuals can track your location without your awareness. You might assume that you are doing everything possible to protect your privacy, but, in reality, these measures may be insufficient. It is crucial to acknowledge the strength of today’s tracking technology.

application-of-gps

How You Can Be Tracked Anywhere

GPS Tracker

GPS trackers are the most extensively used tools for location tracking. They are a common sight in films. This device, which is a diminutive GPS receiver, is often attached to a criminal’s car by law enforcement or agents, enabling them to track the vehicle’s location through a radar system. This is how it operates in practice. However, do you know how readily available and affordable these trackers are for consumers?

$45 on Amazon!

Indeed, one can find them at a lower price by using coupons. These tracking devices can be bought by anyone and attached to your vehicle for the purpose of monitoring, and they are effective in doing so. However, this is the most basic form of location tracking. Although the tracker is diminutive, it can still be identified if you thoroughly inspect your car before taking it on the road.

Mobile Number Tracking

Mobile number tracking is acknowledged as the leading technology in location tracking at present. When an activated mobile number is obtained, it can be entered into a system that allows for the real-time monitoring of a person’s location. This capability is quite troubling.

Anti-tracking king with GPS jammer

The GPS jammer is a cutting-edge device that serves to block GPS signals. It produces interference signals that interfere with and obstruct GPS radio waves. This action results in the inability to establish communication and transmit data between the sender and the receiver.

It should be noted that when we refer to GPS jammers, we are addressing not only the navigation system that is widely employed in North America but also Europe’s Galileo and Russia’s GLONASS. Our GPS jammers can effectively disrupt all of these systems.

In light of this concept, let us investigate the numerous advantages that adopting them will bring to your experience.

GPS jammers are designed for ease of use, eliminating the need for complicated configurations. However, it is crucial to be cautious about particular aspects.

Most signal jammers, including GPS variants, are equipped with several built-in functions. They usually have the capacity to block multiple signal frequencies at once. For example, many of our GPS jammers can also interfere with mobile phone and Wi-Fi signals simultaneously. When the jammer is activated, all signals will be eliminated. The advantageous feature is that our antennas are specifically designed, which permits the disabling of any undesirable functions by removing them.

The functionality of a tracker, irrespective of its technological advancements, is entirely contingent upon GPS signals. Thus, GPS jammers can effectively eliminate these signals. When a jammer is engaged, it obstructs all GPS signals, which prevents the identification of satellites as their transmissions are blocked.

A segment of the population employs GPS jammers for financial reasons. Certain car rental services charge their clients according to the distance traveled, utilizing GPS data for monitoring purposes. Do you grasp this concept?

カテゴリー: blocker, jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 12:40 | コメントをどうぞ

Utilize Signal Jammers to Limit Disturbances

If used properly, signal jammers can be a beneficial tool. Jammers can be used for a variety of purposes, including preventing illegal communications or helping to reduce distractions.

Normally, cell phones are not needed for work.

Like any other tool, cell phones can be used for both productive and non-productive purposes. If cell phones start to cause trouble at work, employers have the right to install signal jammers to stop the phones from interfering with work.

If employees can’t stop using social media or texting, then this can be a great option to simply fire the offending employee. What they can’t access, they can’t use.

If phone calls come in at the wrong time during a lecture, speech, or religious ceremony, it can be a big distraction. With cell phone signal jammers, these calls may not get through at all.

Unfortunately, asking individuals to turn off their devices doesn’t work in large groups. A significant number of people will always leave their devices on, for whatever reason.

Whether or not this is indicative of a larger societal problem, the fact remains. Even during a funeral, the occasional phone call can interrupt a moment of silence or prayer.

In either case, a signal jammer blocks the frequencies that a phone needs to receive a call, thus preventing the phone from ringing because the call won’t be received in the first place.

deal-with-illegal-GPS-tracking

Blocking dangerous or criminal signals

Signal jammers are often used by law enforcement to create signal dead zones where things like phone calls can become a problem, which is partly related to the above argument.

The most straightforward application in the past has been blocking signals that can be used to remotely detonate bombs. These bombs require wireless signals, which are often provided by cell phones and can be blocked like other transmissions.

The ability of a jammers to block criminals from communicating with the outside world is less obvious. This could be useful in a variety of situations, including raids or hostage situations. It makes it harder for thieves to plan together.

To be clear, these are tactics that the military and law enforcement can deploy, but they represent one of the most important applications of this technology. If implemented correctly, it can save lives.

Enforcing Quiet Times

Some parents have begun using signal jammers to get their children to be quiet for a certain amount of time. If the jammer is turned on, Wi-Fi, mobile service, or both are disabled.

This is an effective way to ensure that children follow the rules when doing homework or sleeping, but parents must be careful about the power of the jammer (or they may receive complaints from neighbors).

If the situation seems serious, remember that the cell phone blocker can be turned on or off at any time. You can turn it off when the children do not need to concentrate on other things.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 14:56 | コメントをどうぞ

Cellular Signals and Telecommunications Towers

The time before smartphones is often remembered fondly, as it was a period when communication relied on personal interactions and letter writing. In contrast, the current era is dominated by mobile technology, where we regularly take photos, share them on Facebook, and observe the lives of others. Furthermore, the use of mobile phones has become prevalent in educational institutions, as well as in dining establishments, theaters, and places of worship.

Mobile phones can be a source of distraction in the work environment. This is reflected in the productivity levels of certain manufacturers that have instituted bans on mobile phone usage, resulting in notably higher output. Therefore, it may be beneficial to consider the use of a signal jammers to prevent mobile signals, thereby enhancing employee productivity. It is vital to take concrete steps to ensure that mobile phone usage is healthier and more systematically regulated.

The convenience provided by mobile phones is undeniable; however, this convenience often leads to increased dependency on these devices. This dependency can give rise to poor habits, such as using phones solely before walking or sleeping, and during family interactions. These habits are indeed harmful. As a result, it is essential to regulate mobile phone usage to ensure a healthy lifestyle for both individuals and organizations.

Why can you still receive full signal when the signal jammer is working?

Approximately 30 seconds are required for the phone jammer to effectively block the signal. Once this time has passed, your phone will be unable to make or receive calls. This inquiry is one of the most common among our customers, who often recognize that their mobile phones are indicating a false signal.

A mobile phone base station consists of a mobile switching center (MSC) and a number of base stations (BS) that it supervises. Each base station is provided with a receiver and a transmitter. While the radio signal from the base station creates a circular area of coverage, the actual effective range of each base station is defined as a regular hexagon centered on the base station. Consequently, the combined coverage of all base stations can be represented as a configuration of neighboring regular hexagons.

Hence, mobile communication is identified as cellular communication. In terms of the mobile phone present in each cell, it communicates with the base station via the uplink frequency of the channel, which then forwards the signal to the Mobile Switching Center (MSC) to facilitate communication with other mobile phones.

Each frequency band is divided into many channels with specific bandwidths. Each cell uses several channels, one of which is called the broadcast control channel (BCH) and the other is called the traffic channel (TC). When the mobile phone is in standby mode, it intermittently starts the receiving circuit to receive the BCH of the cell where it is located. According to the field strength of the BCH signal, the signal strength indication is displayed with a signal bar. When making an outgoing call, first ask the MSC for instructions through the BCH, and the MSC handles the caller or the called party. The MSC assigns a service channel to the mobile phone based on the channel conditions in the cell, allowing the mobile phone to jump from the BCH to the service channel, and a call between the two parties is established.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 12:54 | コメントをどうぞ

It Releases a Radio Frequency Comparable to That Emitted by Cell Phones

Cell phones have become an integral part of daily life, enabling individuals to reach out to others at any time. However, this widespread use has adversely affected various public venues, including restaurants, movie theaters, concerts, shopping malls, and churches, as not all users are considerate of when to stop conversing. While many simply complain and move on, some individuals opt for more drastic measures in retaliation. It is important to note that cell phones are designed for two-way communication, and, like any communication medium, their signals can be disrupted.

The primary purpose of cell phone jammers is to block mobile phones from receiving or transmitting signals from base stations. These jammers are effective in creating a controlled area where cell phones are rendered inoperative, without disrupting other communication channels. While they can be used in various locations, cell phone jammers are most commonly found in environments where phone calls may lead to disturbances, including places of worship, libraries, hospitals, movie theaters, and educational facilities.

Interference prevents cell phones from connecting with cell phones

The mechanism of cell phone jammers involves the generation of radio waves that correspond to the frequencies employed by cell phones, which effectively blocks their usage. This interference disrupts the communication pathway between the cell phone and the communication tower, making the phone unusable. When a cell phone jammers is activated, all mobile devices will reflect a status of no network availability, resembling the state of being powered off. When the jammer is deactivated, all phones will swiftly reconnect and restore their full service capabilities.

Two main types of cell phone signal jammers can be identified. The first type is typically a smaller device that disrupts the signal from the cell phone tower to an individual cell phone. The frequencies that are blocked span from 800MHz to 1900MHz. Most devices that utilize this technology can effectively block signals within a radius of about 30 feet, causing cell phones within this area to experience a complete loss of signal.

The second classification of cell phone jammers is often larger and more effective. They operate by preventing satellites from transmitting signals to cell phone towers. Some of the more powerful models can block cell phone signals within a five-mile radius. It is significant to note that these jammers are primarily designed for military applications. Various businesses, such as theaters and restaurants, are pushing for changes in the law to provide a more enjoyable experience for customers, free from the interruptions of ringing cell phones.

英1

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 15:06 | コメントをどうぞ

Implementing Jammers to Deter Micro Devices from Monitoring Conversations

英2

Signal jammers, such as those for cell phones, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth, are often distinct devices. They can be portable or remotely activated in an office context, functioning on the network frequencies of GSM, CDMA, Wi-Fi, or Bluetooth.

Once the jammer is turned on, the mobile phone or other devices will indicate “No signal,” “Please select a network operator,” and “No network found,” among other messages. This indicates that communication within the interference zone is no longer feasible. The interference signal from the jammer also disrupts other wireless data transmissions. Therefore, mobile phones and similar devices cannot function as eavesdropping tools. When a GSM signal jammer is in use, the mobile device is incapable of receiving any external signals. Moreover, cell phone and wifi jammers do not generate strong radio signals or full-frequency noise, ensuring that they do not interfere with the operation of other household devices and are safe for human health.

Hidden cameras, highly sensitive wireless microphones and other spy equipment are installed in hotels, offices, apartments, saunas and cars – regardless of whether this information can benefit the stakeholders or the objects being monitored are harmed. Communication and control with such “bugs” can be carried out via standard radio frequencies such as CDMA, GPS, GSM, wifi, Bluetooth, etc. Another problem is that conventional on-site detectors cannot receive signals from spy devices and hidden cameras. This can lead to a false impression that a certain room is private. Therefore, modern wifi and Bluetooth jammers are designed with these characteristics in mind, suppressing signals in the frequency range of 800 MHz to 2.5 GHz, which overlap with these data channels and make it impossible to communicate with wireless cameras and microphones. The tracker receives “white noise” in the video, i.e. signal paths blocked by interference, so wireless network suppressors ensure anonymity of communication within the working area.

The recent proliferation of specialized tracking technologies based on GPS standards has led to their extensive use. This hidden surveillance technology is not solely intended for the lawful monitoring of an organization’s vehicles. It is also employed by law enforcement and private investigators for various cases, including tracking unfaithful spouses, while businesses may utilize it to analyze the routes and schedules of competitors. Due to their small size and sophisticated technology, miniature GPS trackers are easily concealable and challenging to detect, and they can be readily obtained. As a result, the availability of personal location data poses a direct security threat and can indirectly lead to privacy violations, resulting in various associated issues. Thus, the development of inhibitors for GPS trackers has become increasingly important.

These units serve to block GPS trackers from determining their coordinates by suppressing GPS signals, which leads to the non-transmission or non-reception of “no data” information by the tracker.

These GPS jammers offer the requisite anonymity for the vehicle and prevent the unauthorized retrieval of private information through the GPS channel.

Instruments of radio warfare, including cell phone jammer and GPS signal jammers, effectively counteract marketed spying devices and more substantial equipment that may endanger the commercial and personal interests of individuals or organizations. As many facets of modern life hinge on personal and confidential information, these technological protective measures should not be disregarded, particularly in serious and responsible scenarios. Protect yourself and your employees with modern, practical, and cost-efficient communication channel jammers.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 12:47 | コメントをどうぞ

Federal Action on Cell Phone Jammers in Prisons

ADBF6jammer jmming

This statement is released by the office of Attorney General Chris Carr.

Attorney General Chris Carr is pressing the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to take urgent measures to enable the use of cell phone jammers in state prisons and local jails. The FCC currently enforces a ban on cell phone signal jammers, a restriction that applies to state and local entities. Despite this, contraband cell phones are being used in correctional facilities across the nation to plan violent attacks and engage in other criminal activities, which presents a significant safety risk to correctional personnel, visitors, inmates, and the public.

Carr remarked that the easiest method to protect the public from the hazards of contraband cell phones is to permit the deployment of cell phone jamming technology in correctional institutions. However, he expressed concern that the FCC continues to hinder these efforts. He indicated that this obsolete guidance limits crucial law enforcement tools, poses risks to correctional officers, and allows for the expansion of criminal enterprises both inside and outside of prisons. He emphasized their resolve to combat violent crime in all settings, urging the federal government to remove this significant impediment to public safety.

In the year 2023, Georgia authorities confiscated 8,074 contraband cell phones, and in 2024, they have already seized 5,482. A recent case highlighted the misuse of such devices when an incarcerated leader of the “Yves Saint Laurent Squad” directed the stabbing of an 88-year-old veteran from Georgia via a contraband cell phone. Moreover, a gang leader from North Carolina successfully orchestrated the kidnapping of a prosecutor’s father from his prison cell using a cell phone. In California, prison gangs are reported to use contraband cell phones to facilitate both murders and drug trafficking within the correctional environment.

“There are hundreds of examples across the country of how contraband cell phones in the hands of inmates have been used as lethal weapons and enabled them to continue their criminal activities. We are outraged that these individuals are continuing these activities and endangering the public,” said Georgia Department of Corrections Commissioner Tyrone Oliver. “As attempts to infiltrate our prisons with contraband cell phones continue to evolve, access to jamming technology is critical to our ability to combat these attempts. We thank Attorney General Carr for his support of our ongoing commitment to public safety and safe prison operations.”

In his written communication, Carr remarked that the FCC’s policy is derived from a statute that was put into effect in the early 1990s, which predates the use of contraband cell phones by prison inmates to orchestrate and engage in unlawful and dangerous conduct.

Carr further stated that 47 USC § 333 does not impose any restrictions on the FCC regarding the modification of its policy to enable state agencies to employ cell phone jammers in prisons. In reality, the U.S. Bureau of Prisons has acknowledged the potential effectiveness of cell phone jammers and has received authorization to use them in various federal prisons, including one in Georgia.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 15:02 | コメントをどうぞ

Is There a Device or Method to Call 911?

Is there a device or method to call 911 even if cell phone jammers are being used in the area?

In the past, my abuser would use a cell phone jammer when he broke into my house, preventing me from calling the police right away. I tried to call 911, but the call never went through.

I eventually reported him to the police. I’m worried he’ll show up again. How do I make sure I can call 911 no matter what? Will a wearable panic button still work with a cell phone jammer? What about a satellite communicator for hiking/backpacking?

Realistically, the FCC will only start investigating once the problem is frequently reported because they don’t have staff around the country to do this kind of signals intelligence. If the OP lived in or near a major city, they would have more success because the FCC offices in major cities do have equipment to locate pirate signals and jammers, but again, I don’t think they would respond to any single incident because they would never be able to get there in time to get the information.

There’s a guy in my area who puts a jammer in his car every day when he drives on a busy interstate during rush hour because he thinks it will stop people from using their phones and make his driving safer. All the cell phone carriers reported it, but it took the FCC 3 years to actually investigate and catch him.

In areas with cell phone signal jammers, it can be very difficult to call 911 because the main function of a signal jammer is to block the network signal of the mobile phone.

However, there are several strategies and techniques that may help when calling 911 in an emergency:

  1. Landline Phone: Using a traditional landline phone will not be affected by cell phone signal jammers and can directly dial 911. Although landline phones are not widely available, they may be available in some buildings (such as hotels or office buildings).
  2. Satellite Phone: Satellite phones do not rely on traditional cellular networks and are therefore not affected by ground-based signal jammers. These devices can connect to satellites in extreme environments to send emergency messages. However, satellite phones are more expensive and require direct access to the sky, so they may not work well inside buildings.
  3. Wi-Fi Network Calling: If the Wi-Fi network in the area is not interfered with, using Wi-Fi calling features (such as some smartphones and VoIP apps) may be able to bypass interference and dial 911.
カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 12:32 | コメントをどうぞ

Testing GPS Jammer Tools in Ukraine: Cell Phones

droneuavjamming

Could the approach of linking phones to create a singular, extensive distributed antenna assist in thwarting Russian electronic warfare tactics?

As reported by an American organization developing a system in Ukraine, networked cell phones that operate on specialized software might offer a low-cost and easily implementable counter to the advanced electronic warfare techniques used by Russia.

The use of electronic warfare by Russia, including techniques such as signal jamming and GPS spoofing, complicates the operational landscape for Ukrainian forces, hindering their ability to effectively utilize drones and high-end U.S. weaponry. Detecting and identifying enemy jamming equipment usually requires advanced software-defined radios, which are commonly supplied to the United States and other financially capable military entities. In contrast, smaller militaries like Ukraine’s find it challenging to secure these necessary tools in sufficient numbers due to limited budgets.

If a low-cost system is developed to pinpoint enemy jamming devices, it could empower Ukrainian operators to recover some tactical advantage against their more heavily armed opponents. This development might also reshape the strategies of cellphone network providers in reinforcing their devices against advanced attacks.

Near Christmas of last year, the Ukrainian military reached out to Sean Gorman and his team at Zephr, a company known for its expertise in protecting devices from GPS-signal interference. Zephr promptly sent six Android Pixel phones, loaded with their software, to Ukraine, and in April, they started field tests in areas adjacent to the frontlines in Donetsk.

Gorman conveyed to Defense One that the phones were mounted on drones, incorporated into cars, and arranged on stationary stands. They have also engaged in controlled experiments where their own jamming devices were used, enabling them to pinpoint the location.

The primary focus was to explore if regular consumer phones, working collectively in a network, could indicate the presence of an entity trying to disrupt GPS location data. The results showed that by comparing the GPS reception among different devices, they could detect when one or more phones were under threat.

As Gorman explained, “Our methodology primarily revolves around exploiting the sensors present in the phone. The most crucial sensor is the raw data from the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) that the phone provides. This includes automatic gain control (AGC), Doppler information, carrier phase, code phase, and other data that mobile devices collect concerning their distance from satellites, cellular towers, and other network equipment.”

To optimize performance, manufacturers install these sensors in mobile phones, allowing them to identify the nearest cell tower. The measurements obtained are crucial for the GPS-processing software that informs users of their location. By gathering data from a broad spectrum of phones, one can ascertain which devices are potentially under attack.

As Gorman explained, the computational AI we have implemented in the backend, along with the complexity of our signal and software processing, provides extensive capabilities. Instead of relying solely on sensors or prohibitively expensive antenna arrays, there is a significant advantage in connecting phones to operate as a single, large distributed antenna.

The analyses revealed additional insights into the realm of Russian electronic warfare.

The Baltic Sea is witnessing Russian interference with GPS signals, leading to the display of incorrect location data by receivers. NATO officials have described this as a perilous situation for commercial aviation. A frequent countermeasure against drones is the spoofing of GPS signals, which causes the drone to erroneously perceive that it is above an airport, thus requiring it to land or vacate restricted airspace.

Soldiers in Donetsk, Ukraine, regularly report encountering spoofing attacks targeting their drones. However, Gorman and his team have found that much of this “spoofing” is actually attributable to high-powered jamming attempts. These jamming activities occur within the same frequency bands as GPS or GNSS, which allows them to imitate satellite signals. This phenomenon results in the appearance of phantom or ghost satellites in areas where they cannot logically exist and still deliver a signal, such as beneath the horizon.

In a report to Defense One, Gorman explained that the noise detected does not resemble a conventional GNSS signal, although it does contain energy at the frequencies the receiver is scanning for satellite signals. The signal-processing algorithms of the receiver apply correlation techniques to discern and track these satellite signals. When a powerful jamming signal is introduced, it can create false correlations, leading the receiver to erroneously conclude that it is detecting satellites that are not actually observable.

Currently collaborating with the Ukrainian government under a contractual agreement, the group is focused on advancing their research to go beyond the detection of signal jammers, aiming to pinpoint their locations for potential avoidance or eradication.

According to Gorman’s email, the new techniques being developed will estimate the location of signals of interest using three inputs: 1. localization by range inferred from power; 2. localization by area of effect; and 3. triangulation of jammers based on the angle of arrival. Each smartphone will identify the interference signal, record the last known position, and timestamp the reception, generating data points across the network. By aggregating and processing these signals centrally, the system will triangulate the position of the cell phone jammer.

The U.S. military is channeling substantial funds into alternatives to GPS, often called alternative position, navigation, and timing (Alt PNT), to enable individuals, drones, and other entities to determine their precise locations. Unfortunately, many of these investments have not proven to be particularly fruitful.

As Gorman pointed out, the operation cannot proceed without a predetermined known position, and it is nearly impossible to determine this position without GPS.

The proposed networked approach will not take the place of other, more costly military systems that are utilized for the detection and identification of jammers. However, it does provide a solution that can be implemented swiftly and economically for military organizations such as Ukraine, as well as other groups that may face disruptions from jamming activities, including first responders. Additionally, while it will not replace the pursuit of alternative position, navigation, and timing methods, it may contribute to their improved effectiveness.

Gorman indicated that there could be a radically different perspective to consider. Instead of funneling all resources into Alt PNT and GNSS resilience, which are indeed useful, we might want to assess how this has become a reality. He stressed the importance of mapping and understanding the area in relation to the emitters, which would enable us to steer clear of those areas and remove the emitters.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 14:42 | コメントをどうぞ

The interim panel is hearing evidence regarding signal jammers that could be associated with terrorism

Until the month of June, Vanderburgh County Sheriff Noah Robinson had not acknowledged the degree of disorder that signal jammers could introduce into law enforcement operations.

At that point, his office came across one positioned in the rear section of a car.

In a presentation to an interim legislative committee last week, Robinson indicated that the office had received a notification about a burglary in progress. The staff leveraged the camera systems within the subdivision to locate a vehicle associated with the alleged perpetrators.

P9100308jamming2

Robinson reported that the officer’s radio and computer failed to operate when the vehicle was pulled over.

Signal jammers can effectively obstruct various forms of communication, including Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and GPS, thereby affecting devices such as phones, Ring doorbells, and wireless alarm systems. Robinson mentioned that the wifi jammer his office uncovered has a range of one mile.

He engaged with an interim panel that specializes in the criminal code, calling upon the lawmaker-led entity to consider the formulation of a new law that would make the importation and various uses of the devices illegal.

Robinson remarked that it is not essential to pursue this matter extensively to realize that it possesses other functions, particularly regarding terrorism.

He illustrated various situations where malicious actors could potentially disrupt medical devices in hospitals, hinder police communications through surveillance towers, access the mobile phones of everyday individuals via cellular networks, and manipulate traffic flow controlled by wireless traffic signals.

Under federal regulations, signal jammers are unlawful. The Federal Communications Commission prohibits the marketing, sale, or operation of any device that interferes with authorized radio communications.

Representative Matt Pierce, affiliated with the Democratic Party and hailing from Bloomington, indicated that correctional institutions cannot resort to signal jammers to eliminate their problems with contraband telephones.

Senator Lonnie Randolph, from East Chicago, posed a question regarding the reasons Indiana lawmakers should evaluate potential changes in light of the federal prohibition on these devices.

It was noted by Robinson that Indiana officers are not endowed with “immediate” law enforcement authority due to the absence of a relevant state statute.

Representative Wendy McNamara, who oversees the interim panel and the House’s Courts and Criminal Code committee, conveyed her opinion that Robinson’s office was fortunate, emphasizing that the situation “could have been much worse.”

Yet, she noted that the legislative action regarding the technology might not take place without delay.

Addressing the media, McNamara remarked that, truthfully, we lack a structured method for dealing with signal jammers at present.

カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 12:13 | コメントをどうぞ

Satellite Jammers Disrupt Russian or Chinese Communications

The US Space Force will install 24 satellite jammers capable of disrupting Russian or Chinese communications

SpaceForceJammer

July 23, 2024

War. War never changes: thanks to the military-industrial complex, the technology of war will continue to escalate no matter how the world situation changes. Russia is reportedly developing a high-altitude nuclear device that uses electromagnetic pulses to permanently and indiscriminately disrupt enemy communications. Meanwhile, the United States has just announced a weapon with similar purposes but without the chaotic and irreversible consequences.

The US military is installing modular advanced satellite signal jammer capable of disrupting Russian or Chinese communications if necessary. Although the hardware is terrestrial, the US Space Force will oversee the installation and operation. The technology has already completed prototyping. Earlier this year, the military tested the system at two different locations. The Department of Defense has allocated funds to build 24 remote facilities, 11 of which are scheduled to be deployed by the end of the year.

This equipment is not a preventive measure to prevent adversaries from disrupting US communications. Quite the opposite.

“[The terminals] are small, mobile, and low-cost SATCOM portable jammers that can be deployed in austere environments to protect [U.S. forces],” a spokesperson for the U.S. Space Force’s Rapid Capabilities Office told Bloomberg. “[The jammer gps will be used] to responsibly counter an adversary’s SATCOM capabilities to launch an attack.”

“We intentionally designed a small, modular system using commercial off-the-shelf components. This provides the ability to be proliferated, remotely controlled, and relatively relocatable,” the Space Force said.

Why it matters:

  1. This proves once again that when it comes to electronic warfare involving space assets, no signal is secure.
  2. This makes it pretty clear to you that at least China and Russia, and possibly Iran and North Korea, as well as other nations (and some of our allies) have similar capabilities.
  3. It should reinforce the idea that if a service is really that important (like PNT), we should have multiple widely available ways to get it, not just through space.

Other things to know:

  • Both China and Russia have widely available non-space PNT methods.
カテゴリー: jamming | 投稿者gpsblocker 14:57 | コメントをどうぞ