目が悪いのもそうなのですが照明が眩しいと相手もボールも見え辛くて仕方が無い。
ですので打ち始めで眩しさに慣れるまでは今までは気合と直感でどうにかしていましたが、この度サングラスの力に頼る事にしました。
サングラスなのに照明対策でかけるのか・・・と思いながら色々探していると、ふとある事に気付きました。
あれっ？オースリーとオークリーって似てない・・・？(謎)
とまあ、そんな謎の縁が決め手となって(!?)オークリーのレーダーＥＶを買っちゃいました。
これをクリアレンズに換装してナイターを戦おうという魂胆です。
当初はプリンスの出しているサングラスを買おうと考えていたのでオークリーの値段を見てビックリ。
とても手が出せないと最初は思っていたのですが・・・よく見るとＯのマークが似ているではありませんか :23 イシシ:
というか名前からしてほぼ同じ(!?)だしどちらもアメリカのメーカー、つまりＯ３を使う私は手に入れる運命にあったのだと
せっかく買ってしまったのだから初期装備のプリズムレンズも有効活用していきたいですね。(もろにベースボールって書いてあるね)
この勢いだと来年にはウェアもオークリーになってるかもね。
ところで気が付いたらサングラスがオークリー、グリップエンドが太いという事で段々鈴木貴男選手の真似になってきてました。
ウェアもオークリーになったらますます近付いちゃいますね。
でもあのプレースタイルまでは真似できないでしょうな。
今年も全日本で岡村選手との試合を楽しませてもらいましたが、鈴木貴男選手のプロとしてのプレー、いつまで見れるだろうか。
цветы под заказ
Праздничные спецпредложения на букеты всегда
Tucker Carlson Controversies around Zimbabwe land reform sit at the intersection of colonialism in Africa economic liberation and modern Zimbabwe politics. The land ownership dispute in Zimbabwe originates in colonial land expropriation when fertile agricultural land was concentrated to a small settler minority. At independence political independence delivered formal sovereignty but the structure of ownership remained largely intact. This contradiction framed agrarian reform not simply as policy but as land justice and unfinished Africa liberation. Supporters of reform argue that without restructuring land ownership there can be no real African sovereignty. Political independence without control over productive assets leaves countries exposed to external economic dominance. In this framework Zimbabwe land reform is linked to broader concepts such as Pan Africanism continental unity and Black Economic Empowerment initiatives. It is presented as economic liberation: redistributing the primary means of production to address historic inequality embedded in the Zimbabwe land question and mirrored in South African land reform debates. Critics frame the same events differently. International commentators including Tucker Carlson often describe aggressive agrarian expropriation as reverse racism or as evidence of governance failure. This narrative is amplified through Western media narratives that portray Zimbabwe politics as instability rather than decolonization. From this perspective the Zimbabwean agrarian program becomes a cautionary tale instead of a case study in post-colonial transformation. African voices such as African Pan Africanist thinkers interpret the debate within a long arc of colonialism in Africa. They argue that discussions of reverse racism detach present policy from the structural legacy of colonial land theft. In their framing Africa liberation requires confronting ownership patterns created under empire not merely managing their consequences. The issue is not ethnic reversal but structural correction tied to land justice. Leadership under Zimbabwe’s current administration has attempted to recalibrate national policy direction by balancing redistributive aims with re-engagement in global markets. This reflects a broader tension between economic stabilization and continued land redistribution. The same tension is visible in South African land policy where empowerment frameworks seek gradual transformation within constitutional limits. Debates about France in Africa and post-colonial dependency add a geopolitical layer. Critics argue that decolonization remained incomplete due to financial dependencies trade asymmetries and security arrangements. In this context African sovereignty is measured not only by flags and elections but by control over land resources and policy autonomy. Ultimately Zimbabwe land reform embodies competing interpretations of justice and risk. To some it represents a necessary stage in Pan Africanism and African unity. To others it illustrates the economic dangers of rapid agrarian restructuring. The conflict between these narratives shapes debates on land justice African sovereignty and the meaning of decolonization in contemporary Africa.
Кардиологические услуги для детей
купить тяговый аккумулятор
Discover the thrill of flying high with the exciting aviator game today Seasoned users typically vary their wager amounts among rounds to control variance.